5 Habits To Improve Your Mental Game

Today's update is at the request of viva_la_albert over at /r/tennis/.

I vividly remember an incident during a Stefan Edberg match many years ago. Edberg was the victim of a bad line call. He walked up to stand underneath the umpire's chair, stuck out his bottom lip and with a sharp outward breath blew his hair up a little bit. Edberg then turned around, walked back to the baseline and played the next point. "That," the commentator deadpanned, "is a Swedish tantrum."

Below is Tactical Tennis's short list of five ways you can improve your mental attitude on the court and become a better competitor....

Technology And Tennis: How And When Equipment Has Changed The Game

We see it in news articles about tennis. We hear it from the mouths of commentators on the TV. Tennis stars of years gone by lament about it. What am I talking about? The effect of technology changes on the game of tennis. Graphite frames? Mono-filament strings? We've come a long way from wooden rackets strung with natural gut. Which brings us to the question of today's article on Tactical Tennis:

What technology has really changed in the last forty years, and what effect has it really had on the game?

Part 3: Why Can't Michael Llodra Break Through?

Welcome to Part 3! We finished Part 2 with a big question: if a 6'3, athletic serve and volleyer is our best hope for serve and volley to return to the upper echelons of the game, why not Michael Llodra? He's 6'3. He's fast. His volley technique is superb. He has a world-class slice backhand and isn't afraid to chip and charge on second serves. His service motion is good, and his serve has garnered praise from his fellow pros. So why can't he break through? At 32 it isn't a question of him peaking.

So what is holding Llodra back?

Part 2: Why A Serve And Volley Player Can Succeed

Welcome back to Tactical Tennis for Part 2 of our Serve and Volley series. In Part 1 we looked at the decline of serve and volley tennis in the last decade. Included in the reasons were equipment, technique, adaptation of returners to faster serves, and the longer time it takes for a serve and volley player to mature compared to a base-liner. There is a decided dearth of serve and volleyers in the top 100: for the year end rankings of 2012 on-again off-again serve and volleyer Radek Stepanek is ranked 31, and the only pure serve and volleyer Michael Llodra is 53. Stepanek is a spry 34 years old, and Llodra will be 33 next May.

The future looks bleak. Chris Guccione showed promise, but at 27 he is now ranked 567 despite his formidable serve. Devin Britton won the NCAA Singles title with a mostly serve-and-volley game in 2009 and while his ranking is on an upwards trajectory at 402 in the world, his rise has hardly been meteoric and he's confessed in interviews to not believing pure serve and volley tennis is viable at the pro level. Is Britton correct?

Can a current professional player be a consistent presence in the top 10 in the world as a genuine serve and volleyer?

Part 1.1: The Slowing Of The Court

A quick(ish) addition to address court speed and how it fits into this equation.

It is true that in general the courts are slower than they used to be. This is especially prevalent at Wimbledon, where they've changed the blend of grass as well as kept it short to allow a higher, slower bounce. We've seen a definitive shift on the grass courts in the past decade. In fact, Jim Fawcette over at http://www.fawcette.net/ posted this excellent video in an article he wrote about court speeds. This isn't an endorsement of the content of his post (some of which I agree with and some of which I don't) but I do wish to give credit where credit is due.

However this shift skews the perception of just how much slower courts in general have become. While it is true that hard courts on the pro tour are slower than they were 15 years ago, we don't seem to have any meaningful measurement that gives us concrete numbers. Why that is is a topic of discussion for another post, but let's get down to business:

Does slower courts really mark the death of serve and volley tennis? The short answer, is no.

Part 1: Where Did All The Serve and Volleyers Go?

This is the first in a three-part series on serve and volley tennis in the modern game.

On September 21st, 2007 Tim Henman defeated Roko Karanusic in straight sets to give Great Britain a 2-0 lead in their Davis Cup tie against Croatia. Although he would team with Jamie Murray to seal the victory in doubles the next day, his victory marked Tim Henman's last official singles match on the men's tour. It also marked the last true serve and volleyer at the top of the game. In the 5 years since, we have seen some aggressive players (Tsonga immediately leaps to mind), they are more all-court players, roaming forward occasionally when they see a tactical advantage in doing so. However, they more likely to stay back than not. Even the great Roger Federer - the last man to win Wimbledon serve and volleying nearly every point - uses it sparingly.

So where did all the serve and volleyers go?

Breaking Down The Aussie Open Final

It was long. It was dramatic. But was it everything it was billed to be? Tactical Tennis says "no." While many tennis writers rushed to call the final between Djokovic and Nadal at the Australian Open this year the new 'greatest match ever' (replacing the 2008 Wimbledon Final between Nadal and Federer), it was far from it. In truth, the quality of tennis was, as a whole, far lower than that played in either of the semi-finals that preceded it.